Wednesday, 22 April 2015

Thinking about God

I was thinking about God this morning. It probably was because I was speaking to my old Friend Ed G. last night and he seems to be quite religious. It started when I was getting the car out of the garage and looked at the wheels. They have 5 (or 6) spokes and they were designed by someone somewhere. They are not beautiful. And I thought of all the things in nature that have repetitive geometry and how beautiful they are, as works of God. Even down to the hated dandelion, it has a beautifully shaped puffball of seeds, and if you look at each individual seed it is a work of art.

Then I looked at my bicycle because that is what I was really going for. It looks so good. It is a wonderful fusion of engineering, craftsmanship, and art. The person who put it together must have sat back and had a tremendous rush of satisfaction, a real feeling of being with God.


So I went for a ride and thought about those thoughts, and the sun beaming through the trees, and came home and wrote this.  

Wednesday, 11 March 2015

Ukip Proposals

UKIP Proposals

Reduce foreign aid budget by at least 1% of GDP, and apply this to the armed forces. Most people will like the first and Obama will certainly like the second. Make the army responsible for supplying foreign aid. This means that we have not really reduced foreign aid, we are just supplying it in the form of personnel and skills. How do we get the skills? The army opens up training centres and universities and gives apprenticeships to the young. That helps the unemployment situation. Most people will like that.

If you build up medical training facilities, then you can train nurses who can help with foreign aid, or if they leave, go into the public service. Then we do not need to import so many nurses. Most people will like that.

If the army trains teachers, they could then leave and go into the public sector after doing some foreign aid. Personally I think that many schools could do with a bit of military ethos in educating the young.

The army is becoming ever more high-tech, especially in the need for counter-espionage and cyber warfare. Training of people in these disciplines would help keep Britain in the lead of high technology development. Another winner.

So overall, I have redirected the foreign aid budget to help build Britain, with no reduction in actual foreign aid, just a reduction in the number of Mercedes being bought by despots.


Friday, 30 January 2015

Nice to have a brother who knows great scientists

And from the Daily Telegraph Obituaries 29 January 2015

Charles Townes, Nobel Prize winner - obituary

Physicist who developed a forerunner of the laser and won the Templeton Prize for religion

Charles Townes in 1964
Charles Townes in 1964 Photo: The LIFE Images Collection/Getty
Charles Townes, who has died aged 99, earned the unusual distinction of winning both the Nobel Prize for Physics, for his work on the theory and application of the maser (the forerunner of the laser), and the Templeton Prize for Progress in Religion.
Townes’s belief that science can be reconciled with a belief in God stemmed from his own career as a physicist. When in 1951 he suggested that microwaves could be used to make ultra-precise measurements in the laboratory, he was told by Niels Bohr, the pioneer of quantum mechanics, that he was wasting his time. His head of department at Columbia University, the Nobel laureate Isidore Rabi, also told him to forget it. Yet he refused to give up.
Townes had first became involved with microwave technology during the Second World War when he worked at Bell Laboratories on the design of radar bombing systems. After the war, he turned his attention to applying microwave techniques to spectroscopy, which he saw as a potential tool for the study of the structure of atoms and molecules and for controlling electromagnetic waves.
In 1951 he conceived the idea of a new way to amplify microwaves, by stimulating excited molecules to emit radiation. Three years later, he and his assistants built the first “maser” (an acronym for “microwave amplification by stimulated emission of radiation”). An intense flurry of research followed. Masers have limited applications, although they are used in atomic clocks and as electronic amplifiers in radio telescopes. It was Townes’s brother-in-law, Arthur Schawlow (who would win the 1981 Nobel Prize for Physics), who in 1957 set the ball rolling for the more revolutionary “laser” when he began wondering if the maser principle could be extended to light waves instead of microwaves.
The two men bounced ideas back and forth and decided that potassium vapour might be a suitable medium. Together they wrote a paper outlining the principles of “Infrared and Optical Masers” (now known as lasers – light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation), which appeared in Physical Review in December 1958.

Charles Townes (left) and J P Gordon presenting their atomic clock in 1955 (ROGER VIOLLET)
Townes often cited his discovery of the principles of the maser — an insight that had occurred to him as he sat on a park bench in Washington DC — as a “revelation” akin to a religious experience, and he was often teased by his scientific colleagues for his religious beliefs. In 1966 he published a seminal article, “The Convergence of Science and Religion”, which established him as a unique voice in seeking common ground between the two disciplines. “My own view is that, while science and religion may seem different, they have many similarities, and should interact and enlighten each other,” Townes wrote.
After learning that he had won the Templeton Prize in 2005, Townes explained that his views arose out of his perception that science, like religion, embodies paradoxes which can only be resolved by acts of faith. “There are many mysteries still in science, many mysteries and inconsistencies. Quantum mechanics is inconsistent with general relativity… So what do we do? Physicists just accept it. They believe in both. I think that’s what we have to do in life, recognise there are inconsistencies, places we don’t understand. We have to accept the mysteries and proceed.”
One of six children, Charles Hard Townes was born at Greenville, South Carolina, to Baptist parents on July 28 1915. His father was a lawyer. He was educated at local schools and at Furman University, a Baptist college in Greenville where he took degrees in Physics and Modern Languages and served as curator of the university’s natural history museum.
After taking a master’s degree in Physics at Duke University in 1936 he went on to the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) where he took a doctorate on isotope separation and nuclear spins.
In 1939 Townes became a member of the technical staff at Bell Laboratories, where he specialised in microwave generation, vacuum tubes, and solid-state physics. The radar bombing systems which he developed during the Second World War proved particularly effective in the humid conditions of the Pacific theatre.

Charles Townes in 1961 (The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty)
In 1948 Townes moved to the Physics department of Columbia University, where he became a full professor in 1950. His research continued to be partly funded by the US Navy, which wanted radar systems with smaller wavelengths. This led him to focus on microwave research. He served as executive director of the Columbia Radiation Laboratory from 1950 to 1952 and was chairman of the Physics department from 1952 to 1955.
In 1961 Townes was appointed Provost and Professor of Physics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). In 1966 he became Institute Professor and resigned the provostship in order to return to more intensive research in quantum electronics and astronomy. He went on to look for radiation from molecules in outer space and later became a champion of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence . He was appointed University Professor at the University of California at Berkeley in 1967.
Townes served on a number of scientific committees, notably as chairman of the advisory committee for the first human landing on the moon, and later as chairman of a US Defense Department committee which advised President Ronald Reagan against the deployment of the contentious MX missile system in 1982.
In addition to the Templeton Prize and the Nobel Prize, which he shared with two Russian scientists in 1964, Townes was appointed an Officer of the French Légion d’honneur in 1990, and was the recipient of the Niels Bohr International Gold Medal and nearly 100 other honours and awards. His scientific autobiography, How the Laser Happened: Adventures of a Scientist, was published in 1999.
Charles Townes married, in 1941, Frances Brown, with whom he had four daughters.

Charles Townes, born July 28 1915, died January 27 2015 

Notes from viv: The awarding of the Nobel prize to Townes was very controversial, because they didn't build a laser, only discussed it and laid out some of the principles of the laser.  They were very familiar with the spectroscopy of Ruby crystal (because that's what the maser was made from) and said that it would never work as a laser.
 
But Ted Maiman at Hughes Research did more careful measurements of the spectroscopy of Ruby and lo and behold made a laser out of it.  The first operating laser.  but he didn't get the Nobel prize.
 
It's said that he didn't get the prize because he worked for a company rather than for a university or a government. 
 
I've seen Ted Maiman's notebook , it's in the archives at the Simon Fraser University library.  He ended his career there as an adjunct professor.
 

Saturday, 10 January 2015

Goodbye Guildford

After 15 years of association with Guildford, we are now finished there. From the time in 1999 when Madeleine and Michael first attended the University, through both of their degrees, a number of visits to the Royal Surrey Emergency  ward, and all sorts of good things, to now when Michael is taking his wife and new baby Sophie up to live in Manchester. We have got to know the Guildford area quite well, especially the not-quite-so-good areas where they have had student accommodation, like Park Barn and Bellfields. During this period both Uncle Gordon and Auntie Petroula have died, so that is the end of that families  relationship with Guildford. From the start when the children were in Cathedral court and we visited every fortnight to see that they were OK, and of course because we missed them, to now when we stayed in the Premier Inn in order to see Sophie in the Special Care Baby Unit, it has been an enjoyable relationship. I know my way around Guildford quite well now. We have been to concerts every six months becasue Madeleine played her cello with the Guildford Orchestra. Madeleine has done time in the Royal Surrey Hospital, and Michael has been a stalwart of the Ion Beam centre getting his PhD and working with Charlie.

I liked the shopping areas too.

I also associate Guildford with the A31, because that is the nicest run down to the south, with plenty of interesting places to visit such as Jane Austin's house.

I shall miss it.

Monday, 1 December 2014

Solar Electricity generation thoughts

How to do it and what you need to know.

1. Where do you live. This means the latitude of your home. this is needed because the sun only shines straight down on homes between the tropics of Cancer and capricorn  at Midsummer and midwinter respectively.  At my latitude ( 41 degrees North) the best angle of the sun at Midsummer is xxxx degrees.

2. the angle of your roof. If solar panels are flat on your roof, then this affects the best angle that the sun can have on your roof.   This can be calculated by counting the number of bricks horizontally and then the number of bricks vertically between the eave and the peak, and then measuring these distances against the bricks at a lower height, and calculating the tangent of the angle.

3. is the orientation of the peak of the roof. Ideally it should be East-West so that the roof faces south. As the sun processes across the sky it will be at the best angle at Midday in this instance. If the roof is at a different angle - My roof faces SW by W. Then the sun strikes the roof later in the day.

It is a double integral to calculate the amount of incident sunlight on your solar panels over the year. It also depends on the efficiency of the panels at every angle.


There is another double integral of the depth of the atmosphere at every angle to take into consideration.

------------------------
Two quotes received. One for a 4kw system and the other for a 2.6 kw system as that is what he thinks will be sufficient.  However, the question is- when will it give this power? At Midsummer at noon?   If I play that game I would say that I want a system that will deliver 700watts during most of the day, say from 8AM to 4PM in midwinter. 700 watts seems to be the high regular sort of usage I see on the power meter, with peaks up to 2kw when the kettle is in use.

These quotes  have very basic calculations to determine the values, but are based on charts of radiation that contain some of this information. 

---------------------------
Accepted the quote for the 2.6KW system using Microinverters  and 10 panels.
--------------------------
Assuming I wanted to have two more panels added to this system. Is it viable?

from a DIY Solar PV site I found figures for panels.

Assuming  a panel + inverter costs £350, including the trivial cost of installation with the rest of the system.  What is payback on that £700?  

Negative - That £700 could earn me 2%? in the bank.

2 panels  generates maximum 270w  x 2 =540watts.

Cost of generation income = 14.38p/Kwhr + export  of 4.77pKwhr for 50% of generated electricity (= 2.38pKwhr)     = total revenue of 16.76pKwhr.

equation is 540w x h   = 700£ / (£0.1676/Kwhr)

h = 700 £Kwhr / (£0.1676 x 540w)  =   7734 hr

(Ultimate guestimate) Assuming that you only get this power for 4 hours a day, this gives 1933 days for payback =
 5.3 years.

Friday, 26 September 2014

Security Certificate Fun&Games - or a warning to the wise


Recently there has been a difficulty reaching Google mainly on the XP machine. We keep getting the message about an SSL string too long. I know that I found an indication that TalkTAlk accepts responsibility and is working on it.  

As an attempt to cure the problem as it mostly appeared in Firefox and sometimes in Chrome, I went into Firefox options and deleted a number of Security certificates that looked dodgy, like the one for homeland security, and ones with a tk or ru suffix.

This caused grievous problems as we couldn't get into Facebook, 23snaps, or a number of other sites. I was told this morning that the banking site was unavailable as it didn't have a valid security certificate. During the week some sites have said that the certificate was not there and wouldn't work, and some would let me proceed if I allowed an exception, which I did. I should have kept a record of those.

Today I exported all of the certificates from the Linux computer Firefox, copied those that would on to a memory stick, and started importing them into XP's Firefox. I was able to export the certificates to disk as a single action, but had to import them back in one at a time in a tedious process.
Initially If the first of a named set indicated that it was already installed, I didn't bother with the sub-ones, but later at about the 'c's I realised that the sub-ones sometimes were not present when the main one was, so started being more thorough. I have now installed up to the 'g's, leaving 97 certificates not touched, and it looks like everything is back working. 
I'll keep the certificates on the memory stick for awhile until I am sure. .

Saturday and Amazon gave a certificate warning, so I have put back the rest of the certificates. Of course some were already installed, but I did have to restore some. I had 302 certificates on that memory stick. 

The moral of the story is, don't delete the certificates unless you have taken a backup first, and then only do a few at a time.



Sunday, 7 September 2014

Fixing the Crank

When I updated the Raleigh Grand Prix with a  cotterless crank a few years ago, I didn't notice anything wrong,  but when I replaced the front derailleur recently I did notice that the sprockets are too far out from the frame. As this picture shows the inner sprocket is at least a centimetre out from the frame at the back, where it should be quite close, and the derailleur is at full stretch to get to the large sprocket. I know from looking recently that the spindle is a 5T with a 42mm length on the sprocket side.


Another thing that has bugged me is that when I had to replace the left hand crank I couldn't get a straight one like the old one was.

Then I looked up into the rafters and noticed that the Wasp ( yellow Peugeot with black mudguards) had a straight crank, so I thought that I would swap them.



When I took the crank off I noticed that the end cap seemed to be protruding more that I might have expected, leading me to believe that the spindle had too large a centre measurement to the shoulders. Note the picture (sorry that it is not a good focus)



So I removed the spindle and replaced it with one of the correct size. The one that I removed seems to be quite large in the central dimension. To understand this you need to consult www.sheldonbrown.com/bbsize . The markings on it are not common ones. I will expand on that when I have an explanation. It is possible that it will fit appropriately in the Grand Prix, though the ideal spindle is a 5N.  

11/9/14   Still cannot find an explanation of the markings, but it seems that the central dimension is 57mm, according to the LBS, therefore not appropriate to the bike. So I binned it.

Another test that I did today was to come on to the smaller sprocket and note that the shaft of the derailleur was still 9mm extended, so therefore in theory I could reduce the length of the spindle by 9mm from the current 42mm.


4 Feb 2015

This 5T spindle  was not symmetrical. I have been shopping around for the 'ideal' spindle as noted above, and yesterday after visiting the Forge Cycle Works in Ringwood and asking if they had a spindle to fit, I came home and swapped the spindle around so that the long end is on the left side. This has made the changer fit nicely and work well, and then I decided to measure the distance from the seat post out to the end of the crank. On both sides this was 6 cm which means that the crank is now, as far as I am concerned, symmetric. Also each crank  missed teh frame by about 1.5 cm at it's rearmost position.

Too me this is perfect and I am a happy guy.